Dr Ellis Anniston Al

Then, 1 day after work, the defendant got in her car and “just drove.” The next matter she remembered was waking up in a motel room in Maryland and not focusing on how she got there. During this time period, she considered suicide, and she expressed this to her mother.

  • Philomena Delores Ellis was convicted of murder in violation of Ala.Code 1975, § 13A-6-2, and was sentenced to 35 years’ imprisonment.
  • Treated during 2014 were Hypertension, High Cholesterol, Ischemic CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE and Diabetes.
  • witnesses or other evidence, or by cross-examination made to weaken the defense expert’s credibility.” USA v. Kennedy, 578 F.2d 196, 198 (7th Cir.), cert.
  • Should you be Dr. Ellis, you might remove your past affiliations by updating your profile.
  • You may arrange an free eye exam, buy prescription eyeglasses, RX sunglasses or donate your old eyeglasses utilizing the contact information in the directory.

Their testimony revealed that the defendant was first married when she was 16 years old. She dropped out of senior high school and had a son, Jonathan, who was simply 16 years old at the time of the trial. Hawaii presented no expert testimony on the defendant’s mental condition during the homicide. Emergency medical personnel arrived on the scene within minutes of the defendant’s call. Upon being asked by a firemedic if she “did it,” the defendant “nodded” and, in reaction to the question “why,” said something about her husband.

Dr Gary William Murrell, Od

If you believe our view of your activity is unwarranted, please Contact our customer support team. 1.) We’ve detected an unusual amount of improper or excessive behavior such as for example using our site to compile business lists, company information, accumulate sales leads, etc. It is a breach of our Terms USEFUL.. Completing the CAPTCHA proves you are a human and helps prevents automated usage of NPIdb.org that could have a negative impact on user experience. This section highlights the procedures that Dr. Ellis performs most frequently. If you want to highlight your profile near the top of relevant searches, directories, and profiles on CareDash, please visit our Advertising Answers to learn more.
Both experts indicated that the defendant had not informed them of certain facts we consider significant that the defendant related to the jury from the witness stand concerning her past psychological history. The jury could have concluded that the defendant’s trial testimony about incidents she neglected to tell the mental health professionals about was manufactured, or at the very least creatively remembered, in light of her later becoming aware of the textbook outward indications of major depression. See also Greider v. Duckworth, 701 F.2d 1228, 1234 (7th Cir.1983) (“The jury could credit the testimony of lay witnesses over that of an expert witness”); United States v. Emery, 682 F.2d 493, 498 n. 2d 615 (“The jury will get expert testimony adequately rebutted by the observations of laymen”). Content supplied by HealthCare6.com mainly originates from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services published data and the FOIA-disclosable NPPES doctor data file. The info disclosed on the NPI Registry and in the downloadable files are FOIA-disclosable and are required to be disclosed under the FOIA and the eFOIA amendments to the FOIA.

  • Captain Cesar Yamill Figueroa was a board “eligible” however, not “certified” psychiatrist and the chief of the Community Health Service at Fort McClellan.
  • Treated being an optometrist in Anniston, AL during 2013 were eye procedures.
  • This content on Healthgrades does not provide medical advice.
  • 2d 918, 921 (Ala.1990) (“he State is not a party entitled to a trial by jury on a misdemeanor appeal….”).

The doctors informed her that the blackouts were a result of hyperventilation. This doctor profile was updated by using the public dataset from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services that is publicized on Friday, November 17, 2017, and correspondent NPI home elevators the general public NPPES record dated Thursday, September 30, 2010. If you found out that something incorrect and want to change it out, please follow this Update Data guide. ProfilePoints™ gauge the overall completeness of a provider’s profile, including items like having a photo, a biography, insurance, payment options, etc. A full breakdown of points can be seen by providers with Doctor.com accounts when editing their profile on Doctor.com. Dr. Robert Ellis practices optometry .

Are You Dr Robert Ellis, Od? Claim Your 100% Free Doctorcom Profile To:

Dr. Robert Ellis Jr. speciality, credentials, practice address, contact contact number and fax are as below. Patients can directly walk in or can ask the below given contact number for appointment. Dr. Robert Ellis Jr. is really a Anniston, Alabama based male Optometrist with 19 years of experience in Optometry. He completed his graduation from University Alabama Birmingham – School Of Optometry in 2003.
Find contact information here to make an appointment. What other Optometrists practice nearby? Click here to compare with other Optometrists.

witnesses or other evidence, or by cross-examination made to weaken the defense expert’s credibility.” USA v. Kennedy, 578 F.2d 196, 198 (7th Cir.), cert. See also USA v. Esle, 743 F.2d 1465, 1474 (11th Cir.1984) (“Where … the basis of the expert’s opinion has been thoroughly impeached, the court, as fact finder, is thus plainly authorized to reject the opinion entirely”). Dr. Bell testified that in her opinion the defendant did not have the substantial capacity to understand the criminality of her conduct and to conform her conduct to certain requirements of the law, and that her inability to do so was impaired by outward indications of her mental illness. Dr. Bell candidly admitted that, even though her opinion was to the contrary, the defendant “could have” appreciated the criminality of her conduct and could have conformed her conduct to certain requirements of the law even though she was experiencing major depression with psychotic features. In case a person is having eye issues, they usually begin with an optometrist.

Besides Ms. Williamson, the babysitter, the state called two other witnesses to testify in its case on rebuttal. Edward F. Dean, Jr., testified that he was an initial sergeant stationed at Fort McClellan, Alabama, and that the defendant was a soldier in his company working as a records clerk in the student military personnel section. He stated that the defendant was a “very good worker,” that “her work was always exceptionally done well,” and that her “supervisors always applauded and gave her accolades in her duty performance.” He testified that the defendant was “happy at that time,” and that he never really had the impression that she was depressed in any fashion. Both defendant and her mother, Daisey Mae Davis, testified for the defense.
Even though defendant and her mother testified that the defendant had severe disabling headaches and deep depression involving memory loss and blackouts, the defendant’s husband, the babysitter, and the defendant’s superiors in the military indicated that the defendant had never appeared depressed and was highly efficient in her job. The experts’ testimony that the defendant was insane during the crime “may be strongly persuasive; but it can hardly be reported to be conclusive.” Howard v. State, 172 Ala. 402, 409, 55 So. The only real expert testimony concerning the defendant’s mental condition was presented by the defense. Captain Cesar Yamill Figueroa was a board “eligible” but not “certified” psychiatrist and the principle of the Community Health Service at Fort McClellan. He had psychiatric training but hadn’t taken the “boards.” He first interviewed the defendant on October 22, 1987, the day after the homicide. In this case, the defendant presented the only real experts, and those experts testified that the defendant was insane.

Similar Posts